Research Feed

This study questions whether the Five-Factor Model fully captures traits relevant to criminal behavior. It finds that only agreeableness and conscientiousness consistently predict offending, while additional criminogenic traits (such as deception and self-deception) add substantial explanatory power beyond the FFM. These traits significantly improved prediction of offending in both student and prisoner samples, suggesting important limits to the model’s coverage and to assumptions about accurate self-reported personality.

This meta-analysis of 59 studies demonstrates that personality research provides a powerful lens for understanding criminology. By comparing four major structural models—PEN, the three-factor model, the FFM, and the seven-factor model—the authors found that antisocial behavior consistently correlates with specific traits. Regardless of the framework used, the strongest predictors of antisocial behavior are low Agreeableness and low Conscientiousness. These results suggest that the 'core' of criminal and antisocial tendencies lies in a lack of empathy, poor impulse control, and a disregard for social norms, providing a unified psychological profile for future criminological research.

This research clarifies that altruism and antisocial behavior are independent dimensions rather than opposite ends of one spectrum. Altruism is primarily shaped by familial environments and positive emotionality, while antisocial behavior stems from genetics and negative emotionality combined with low constraint. Because these tendencies arise from distinct etiologies, they can coexist within an individual, functioning as uncorrelated personality expressions rather than mutually exclusive traits.