Research Feed

This narrative review of 31 studies finds that chronic stress is consistently associated with higher neuroticism and lower levels of the remaining four Big Five traits. The neuroticism link is the strongest and most well-replicated; evidence for reduced conscientiousness is moderate; associations with extraversion, agreeableness, and openness are meaningful but largely cross-sectional. The relationship is likely bidirectional, and social support, coping strategies, and socioeconomic status all moderate these effects.

Wu, Van der Linden, Liu et al. (2026) asked whether creativity is better predicted by individual personality traits or by an overall personality profile. Using 197 Chinese college students, they found that people who score high across all five traits simultaneously (open, conscientious, outgoing, agreeable, and emotionally stable) tend to be rated as more creative by peers and themselves, and perform better on creative thinking tasks. No single trait explained as much as the combined profile.

Aravindh et al. (2026) surveyed 260 retired older adults in Chennai, India, finding that roughly one-third showed problematic or at-risk internet use. Among Big Five traits, conscientiousness was negatively associated with internet addiction while neuroticism and openness were positively associated; extraversion and agreeableness showed no significant links. Younger age, higher education, and prior government employment were also independent predictors of problematic use.

Zavhorodnia and Shepelova (2026) studied 147 Ukrainian university students (mean age 24, 78% women) during wartime martial law. Emotional stability was the strongest protective factor for subjective well-being, followed by openness, extraversion, and conscientiousness. Agreeableness unexpectedly predicted well-being decline, likely reflecting emotional exhaustion from caregiving demands in a predominantly female sample. Openness mediated effects of extraversion and novelty tolerance, and emotional stability moderated openness's protective role.

Wilson and Calanchini (2026) examined how cultural tightness — the strength of social norms and intolerance of deviance — predicts personality at regional levels. Across U.S. states, tighter regions scored higher in conscientiousness and lower in openness. Cross-nationally (56 countries), tighter nations scored lower in extraversion and the creativity facet of openness. Agreeableness, neuroticism, and most conscientiousness facets showed no consistent relationships with tightness.

Oberwemmer et al. (2026) tested whether spousal bereavement produces posttraumatic growth (PTG) as Big Five trait change in 256 Dutch adults tracked across seven years with matched controls. No growth-consistent changes emerged. Instead, bereaved individuals showed a temporary neuroticism spike surrounding the loss (more pronounced in men) followed by partial recovery, plus persistently lower conscientiousness post-loss. The authors suggest perceived PTG may reflect misattributing neuroticism's decline from its peak as genuine growth.

Among nearly 9,000 Brazilian teachers, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness were elevated while Negative Emotionality was low, replicating the occupational personality profile found in Western samples. Teaching-specific social-emotional and instructional characteristics mapped onto this Big Five structure but formed a distinct sixth factor, with personality accounting for only about 27% of their variance, leaving substantial teaching-relevant individual differences unexplained by broad traits alone.

A 2026 South African study (n=118) found work engagement positively linked to all Big Five traits except neuroticism, which correlated negatively. Extraversion and conscientiousness were the strongest predictors. Basic psychological need satisfaction (especially "joyful connection") explained additional engagement variance beyond personality traits alone. Research purpose: This study investigated the associations among work engagement, personality traits, and basic psychological needs from an organisational neuroscience perspective. Motivation for the study: Few studies have explore...

When people feel more satisfied at work, they gradually become more conscientious and emotionally stable, and those personality shifts in turn make them even more satisfied, creating a self-reinforcing cycle. Two large studies confirmed this goes both ways, with effects building and then fading over time rather than operating steadily. This suggests workplaces aren't just where personality shows up, they're where it develops. Organizations that invest in employee satisfaction may be inadvertently cultivating more reliable, emotionally resilient workers, while employees should recognize that their job choices can fundamentally reshape who they are over time.

Using cluster analysis with 426 Polish participants, Kotus identified three Big Five personality profiles predicting pet attachment. Cluster 1 (high extraversion, openness, emotional stability) showed lower attachment. Clusters 2 (high neuroticism, low extraversion/openness) and 3 (low openness, high conscientiousness, need for predictability) both showed stronger attachment, with animals serving compensatory social functions: particularly as human-relationship substitutes for Cluster 2 and stress-regulating companions for Cluster 3.

This multimodal AI system predicts Big Five personality traits from text, speech, and facial expressions using the myPersonality dataset (86,220 participants). GPT-3 achieved 89.1% accuracy, with Openness (91%) and Extraversion (90%) most reliably classified. Agreeableness proved hardest to detect via speech, while lexical features dominated trait prediction overall, outperforming audio and visual cues.

A 2026 multilevel meta-analysis (k=34 studies) found agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and openness positively associated with healthy eating and fruit/vegetable consumption; neuroticism was negatively associated. Agreeableness and conscientiousness also predicted lower sodium intake. Effect sizes were small but reliable, with openness-diet associations stronger in samples over age 30.

This study developed an efficient AI system for predicting Big Five personality traits from long-form life narrative interviews (the kind of detailed life stories people tell about key events and relationships). Rather than relying on questionnaires, which can be biased, the model reads how people naturally describe their lives. It accurately detected trait-relevant language: Openness in creativity and adventure, Neuroticism in health struggles and regret, Agreeableness in warmth and mentorship, suggesting personality leaves consistent, readable fingerprints in the stories we tell about ourselves.

Using a cross-sectional sample of 3+ million participants across 68 countries, this study examined how age moderates gender differences in Big Five personality traits. Women scored higher than men on Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness; men scored higher on Openness. The gender gap widened with age for all traits except Neuroticism, which narrowed. Cultural factors (particularly individualism, education, and later marriage ages) explained cross-national variation in these age-moderated gender differences.

A theoretical analysis argues the human Big Five personality model is inappropriate for describing great ape personality, as structural overlap between human and ape trait dimensions is below 50% for chimpanzees and as low as 25% for other great apes. The author proposes studying simpler, cross-species facets (like sociability, curiosity, and fearfulness) instead.

This BBC article explores how genes and environment interact to shape personality. Twin studies suggest 40–50% of Big Five personality differences are genetic, but genome-wide association studies find only 9–18% heritability—a gap researchers are working to explain. Environmental influences are equally complex: major life events have little lasting impact, while personality appears to be "poly-environmental," shaped by many small cumulative experiences interacting with genetic predispositions.

Using a 2022 survey of 1,306 U.S. federal bureaucrats, this study examines how Big Five personality traits shape perceptions of agency politicization. Neuroticism is the standout finding: more neurotic employees are significantly more sensitive to formal politicization, perceiving greater appointee influence. Conscientiousness shows weaker, mixed effects; Openness, Extraversion, and Agreeableness show no consistent moderating role.

A study of 72 software engineering students found that roughly one-quarter of "problematic" learners are actually high-neuroticism "delayed starters" (anxious, deadline-driven students who spike activity 67% within 72 hours of due dates). By contrast, high-conscientiousness students showed steady performance, high-agreeableness students engaged 76% more in forums, and high-openness students accessed 3.2× more optional materials. The author recommends milestone-based assessments and learning analytics to better support personality-driven learning differences.

Among 121 Gen Z participants in Surabaya, emotional regulation negatively predicted impulsive buying (higher regulation, lower impulsivity), while social presence positively predicted it (more social influence, more impulsive purchases). Together, both variables significantly explained impulsive buying behavior. Findings suggest that strengthening emotional regulation and moderating social media exposure may reduce impulsive purchasing tendencies in this digitally native generation.

Using latent profile analysis across 3,600+ men from 103 countries, this study challenges the prototype of the extraverted, confrontational ally. "Well-Adjusted" men (high on all Big Five traits, low neuroticism) rated both committed and relationship-building allyship strategies as best-fitting. Character strengths (especially bravery, kindness, and social intelligence) explained additional variance beyond Big Five traits, suggesting allyship training should leverage diverse personalities and strengths.